论文部分内容阅读
目的:利用两种方式治疗难治性妇产科大出血,观察对比两种方式的治疗效果。方法:随机将我院2014年1月~2017年1月期间收治的46例难治性妇产科大出血患者分为对照组与观察组各23例,观察组患者利用经导管动脉栓塞术止血,对照组利用髂内动脉结扎术止血。结果:利用动脉栓塞术止血的观察组患者其止血效果明显优于利用髂内动脉结扎术止血的对照组患者,观察组各项指标均明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论:利用经导管静脉栓塞术对妇产科大出血进行治疗,可以获得很好的临床疗效,同时有利于缩短患者流血事件、减少流血量,对提高患者生活质量具有非常重要的作用,具有较高的临床应用价值。
Objective: To treat refractory obstetrics and gynecology major bleeding by two ways, and to observe and compare the curative effect of two ways. Methods: 46 patients with refractory obstetrics and gynecology major hemorrhage admitted in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2017 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 23 cases each. Patients in observation group received transcatheter arterial embolization to stop bleeding, Control group using internal iliac artery ligation to stop bleeding. Results: The hemostatic effect of observation group using arterial embolization was significantly better than that of control group using hemostasis of internal iliac artery ligation. The indexes in observation group were significantly better than those in control group (P <0.05) . Conclusion: The treatment of gynecological bleeding by transcatheter arterial embolization can obtain good clinical curative effect, and at the same time help to shorten the bleeding event and reduce the blood loss, which has a very important effect on improving the quality of life of patients with higher The clinical value.