论文部分内容阅读
“陷阱取证”是法学理论和司法实践中一个非常复杂的问题,试从刑事和民事两大方面分析“陷阱取证”的合法性、必要性和可行性“。陷阱取证”是来源于刑事诉讼中的概念,但在民事诉讼中也有所运用“。陷阱取证”通常分为“机会提供型”和“犯意诱发型”两种类型。犯意诱发型“陷阱取证”会引起诸多问题,所以是非法的。本文分析讨论了刑事案件中的“陷阱取证”的合法性,并从三方面说明采用机会提供型“陷阱取证”进行刑事侦查的必要性;探讨了民事诉讼案件中以“陷阱取证”的方式获得证据是否应予以采纳的问题。根据我国法律规定,作为定案根据的证据必须具有客观性、关联性和合法性三个特征。并认为在民事诉讼中不应提倡陷阱取证。
“Trap Evidence ” is a very complicated issue in legal theory and judicial practice. From the two aspects of criminal and civil trials, we analyze the legitimacy, necessity and feasibility of “trapping evidence” “ Is derived from the concept of criminal proceedings, but also used in civil litigation. ”Trap evidence“ is usually divided into ”opportunity to provide “ and ”intentionally induced “ two types. Intentionally induced ”trap evidence“ will cause a lot of problems, it is illegal. This article analyzes and discusses the legitimacy of ”evidence-based“ in criminal cases and the necessity of using criminal-type ”evidence-based“ to provide opportunities to provide evidence from three aspects. It also discusses the ”traps“ Evidence ”way to get the issue of whether evidence should be adopted. According to the provisions of our country’s law, evidence as the basis of the verdict must have three characteristics: objectivity, relevance and legitimacy. And that in civil proceedings should not promote traps evidence.