论文部分内容阅读
目的:应用早期护理干预模式对出现偏瘫失语症的脑梗塞患者在治疗期间实施护理的临床效果进行研究。方法:选择在本院就诊的出现偏瘫失语症的脑梗塞患者86例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组43例。对照组患者接受常规脑梗塞护理;观察组患者接受早期护理干预。对比两组研究对象脑梗塞偏瘫失语症治疗期间的护理服务满意度、脑梗塞偏瘫失语症治疗效果、语言功能和活动能力恢复时间、脑梗塞治疗时间、治疗期间不良反应发生情况等各项指标。结果:对照组患者对护理服务满意度为81.4%低于观察组患者对护理服务满意度的95.3%(P<0.05);对照组治疗总有效率为69.8%低于观察组治疗总有效率的90.7%(P<0.05);语言功能和活动能力恢复时间、脑梗塞临床治疗总时间较对照组发生明显缩短(P<0.05);在治疗期间观察组患者不良反应发生率较对照组低(P<0.05)。结论:应用早期护理干预模式对出现偏瘫失语症的脑梗塞患者在治疗期间实施护理的临床效果非常明显。
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical effect of nursing care during the treatment of cerebral infarction patients with hemiplegia aphasia using early nursing intervention model. Methods: A total of 86 patients with cerebral infarction who developed paralysis and aphasia in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 43 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received routine cerebral infarction care; patients in the observation group received early nursing intervention. The satisfaction of nursing service, the therapeutic effect of aphasia in cerebral infarction, the recovery time of language function and activity ability, the treatment time of cerebral infarction and the adverse reactions during treatment were compared between the two groups. Results: The satisfaction rate of nursing service in control group was lower than 95.3% (P <0.05) of nursing service satisfaction in observation group and control group was 69.8%, which was lower than the total effective rate of treatment group 90.7% (P <0.05). The recovery time of language function and activity ability and the total clinical treatment time of cerebral infarction were significantly shorter than those of the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that of the control group during the treatment period <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of early nursing intervention on patients with cerebral infarction with hemiplegia aphasia during the treatment is obvious.