评定一堂历史课的质量是重要的。这无论是对一个学校的领导检查教学,还是教师互相听课的评议,甚至对师范院校历史系实习学生的教学成绩评定,都是如此。如果没有一个客观的、公认的标准作依据,仁者见仁,智者见智,主观随意,各有所好,一个人一把尺,是不会公正地评价一堂课的,其结果只能使教者无所适从,有碍历史教学工作的改进和提高,更不能为历史教学的改革指出一个正确的方向。此外,只有提高每一 It is important to assess the quality of a history lesson. This is the case both for examining the leadership of a school, for evaluating teachers for lecturing each other, and for evaluating the teaching achievement of internship students of history departments of normal universities. If there is no objective and accepted standard, the benevolent sees the benevolent, the wise seeks the wisdom, the subjective benevolent, the well-behaved, the measure of one’s own will not impartially evaluate a lesson and the result will only make the benefactor , Hinder the improvement and improvement of the history teaching work, but can not point out a correct direction for the reform of history teaching. In addition, only improve each one