论文部分内容阅读
如果说犯罪嫌疑人在警方侦查阶段所拥有的权利则是比较少的,那么犯罪嫌疑人或刑事被告人在预审以及审判时所拥有的权利是得到了明显加强的。通过对扩大辩护权范围的刑事诉讼法典修订提案的研究,作者认为其中有一些是可行的(比如加强与当事人及律师在卷宗上的沟通),而另一些从本质上看则是无意义地拖延程序(比如将拘暂时开始的所有对质询问进行录音),甚至是从预算方面来看完全不现实的。另外,在辩护权与调查效率之间应取得微妙的平衡。
If the criminal suspects in the investigation phase of the police have fewer rights, then the suspects or criminal defendants in the pre-trial and trial have the right to have been significantly strengthened. Through the study of proposed amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure to expand the scope of the defense, the authors consider that some of them are viable (such as enhancing communication with parties and lawyers on files), while others essentially inadvertently delay the proceedings (Such as recording all the interrogation questions that have been in force since the beginning of the moratorium), even completely unrealistic in terms of budget. In addition, there should be a delicate balance between the right to defense and the efficiency of investigations.