逻辑本来是西方人的思维方式的特殊表现,但经历了几个世纪的帝国主义侵略之后,它几乎已经成为具有普世性的法则和言说方式。没有逻辑,则无话可说,属于名副其实的无理取闹甚或胡说八道。但是,就思想本身的从心所欲来看,人们既有能力跨越文化和语言边界,她|他们的力量应该来自于自身特殊的思维方式。如果逻辑以其毁灭性的力量,试图统一甚至同化所有人的思想,则其适应性必然遭受质疑。另一方面,不管是中国的思想家还是西方的哲学家,都已经开始揭露逻辑本身的弊端、它的重复性和封闭性,以打破它的中心主义态势。在这种思想背景下,翻译研究有必要有针对性地探讨逻辑问题。实际上,翻译历来都在拒斥逻辑的大一统作用。不这样,它存在者的地位早就岌岌可危了。 Logic has always been a special manifestation of Westerners’ ways of thinking, but after centuries of imperialist aggression, it has almost become a universal law and way of saying. No logic, then nothing to say, belong to the verbiage of verbiage or even nonsense. However, as far as the mind itself is concerned, people have the ability to cross cultural and linguistic boundaries. Their power should come from their own special way of thinking. If logic tries to unify and even assimilate the ideas of all with its devastating power, its adaptability must be questioned. On the other hand, both Chinese thinkers and western philosophers have begun to expose the shortcomings of the logic itself, its repetitiveness and its closeness in order to break its centralist posture. In this kind of ideological background, it is necessary for translation studies to probe logically the problem. In fact, translation has traditionally been a rejection of the grand unity of logic. Otherwise, the status of its being has long been precarious.