论文部分内容阅读
古典和新古典理论基于经济理性、充分信息、完全竞争假设,将企业看作一个生产计划集,忽视了企业内部制度安排,但其抓住了企业的根本特征——生产性。科斯的理论加强了企业内部制度安排和企业交易性的研究,使对企业性质的理解大大加深。但是,继科斯之后的现代企业理论在发展中却过于强调企业的交易性,忽视了对其生产性的研究,从而使对企业性质的理解片面化。从本质上看,企业是生产性和交易性的统一,市场中的企业表现为人力资本与物质资本的契约。
Classical and neoclassical theories, based on economic rationality, sufficient information and perfect competition hypothesis, regard the enterprise as a production planning set, neglecting the internal institutional arrangements of the enterprise, but seize the fundamental characteristic of the enterprise - productiveness. Coase's theory strengthens the study of institutional arrangements and business transactions in enterprises and greatly deepens the understanding of the nature of business. However, following the post-Kos modern enterprise theory in the development of too much emphasis on business transactions, ignoring the study of its productivity, so that the understanding of the nature of one-sided business. In essence, the enterprise is a unity of production and transaction, and the enterprises in the market are manifested as contracts of human capital and material capital.