论文部分内容阅读
在本刊六月号刊登的有关公元纪年问题的一文,我们曾说要把一切有关的名词和概念一一提出讨论,但由于笔者疏忽,其中有一个概念未予说清,一个概念忘记交代,现在特予补充说明,并向读者致歉。未予说清的概念,就是关于公元前的旬纪的问题,我们只说公元前某一旬纪的起迄年分要按公元后旬纪的年分来倒写。这句话有语病,很容易引起误解。例如公元后五世纪的第二旬纪当写为411—420,但这不等于说公元前五世纪的第二旬纪就可写作420
In a paper published in the June issue of AD on the issue of the year of the Christian era, we once said that we should discuss all the relevant terms and concepts one by one. However, one of the concepts was not clearly explained and the concept was forgotten because of the author’s negligence. Now for extra explanation, and apologize to readers. The unsolved concept is a question about the ten-year BC. We only say that the year-to-year of a certain ten-year BC before the end of the Christian era should be written in the year of the tenth century AD. This phrase has language disease, it is easy to cause misunderstanding. For example, the second half of the fifth century AD written as 411-420, but this does not mean that the second half of the fifth century BC can write 420