论文部分内容阅读
民事诉讼法第二百三十一条明确将限制出境措施确定为执行威慑措施,但是未对限制出境的审查原则、内容和程序作出明确规定。本文认为,应对书面提出的对被执行人的限制出境申请采取形式和实质一并审查的原则,对申请内容的必要性、适当性和效果性进行评估,从而做出判断。其程序应当以决定书的形式,在3日内作出同意或不同意限制出境申请的决定。对申请不予准许的,法院应当告知申请人可以依照民事诉讼法第二百二十二条的规定提出异议。法院也可以要求申请执行人提供适当的担保,避免因权利的滥用而给被执行人造成不必要的损害。
Article 231 of the Code of Civil Procedure clearly defines the restriction of exit measures as a deterrent measure, but it lacks definite provisions on the review principles, contents and procedures for restriction of departure. This paper argues that we should judge the necessity, adequacy and effectiveness of the application content according to the principle of censorship of the enforced person ’s exit restriction submitted in writing. The procedure should be in the form of a decision book, within 3 days to make a decision of consent or disagreement with restrictions on exit applications. If the application is not permitted, the court shall inform the applicant that it may file an objection in accordance with the provisions of Article 222 of the Civil Procedure Law. The court may also require the applying executor to provide proper guarantees to avoid unnecessary damage to the executed party due to abuse of rights.