彙考緣起早年研讀朱伯崑先生《易學哲學史》,讀到第五章《唐代易學哲學的發展》,其引言曰“李氏《集解》主要是集録各家的注釋,自己的論點較少,基本上是資料性的彙編,其在易學史特别是易學哲學史上的地位還不能同《正義》相比”~②,當時以爲誠如是説。暑期通讀《周易集解》,深感李鼎祚别具心裁,論《易》博採衆長,其案語散見書中,值得集中探討。學界研究李鼎祚易學,多是其人其書之評價,從《集解》舊注選材,看李氏易學主張等。愚以爲,李氏易學最直接、最可靠之材料,當屬自序與案語。《周易集解序》, In the early years of the Remittance Examination, Mr. Zhu Bo-kun studied “the history of Yi-ology” and read Chapter Five, “The Development of Yi-ology in the Tang Dynasty”. The introduction reads: “Li’s collection” is mainly composed of annotations of each family. Few, basically, a compilation of materials, its position in the history of Yi learning, especially Yi-ology, can not yet be compared with “justice” “~” ②, at that time as honest as saying. Read through the “Book of Changes” in the summer, deeply aware of the uniqueness of Li Dingtao, on the “easy” Bocaizhongzong, its text scattered books, it is worth focusing on. In the academic circle, Li Dingtao is easy to learn, mostly his book evaluation, from the “old solution” collection of notes, see Lee’s ideas and so on. Stupid thought, Lee’s most easy to learn the most reliable material, undoubtedly self-introduction and the case. “Book of Changes episode”