艺术史如同一部情节难料的叙事诗。在过去的50年间,米歇尔·杜尚由起初的默默无闻到后来的成就斐然,艺术的评判标准随着时间的流逝在不断发生着演变。今天那些似乎不受关注的作品,明天的命运并非注定如此。重新定位一件艺术作品最有效的途径之一就是要看艺术家的品位与热情。但不是每一个人都能接受这种智慧的评判标准,多数人还是依据所谓的原则教条来下结论。随着从前被密封起来的艺术家们一些与创作相关的典故和风格等问题的公开,呈现给观众一个全新的视角去审读那些曾经被大众冷落的作品和他们被漠视的时期。伴随着这一切的被认可,艺术史家和艺术批评家们 Art history is like an unforgettable narrative poem. For the past 50 years, Michel Duchamp has been remarkably successful from the initial obscurity, and the standards of artistic judgment have been evolving over time. The destinies of tomorrow are not destined to be those works that today seem unnoticed. One of the most effective ways to reposition a piece of art is to look at the artist’s taste and passion. However, not everyone can accept the criteria for judging this kind of wisdom, and most people come to conclusions based on the so-called dogma of principle. With the openness of some of the previously sealed-up artists’ allusions and styles related to the creation, the audience was given a fresh perspective to review the works once neglected by the public and the period when they were neglected. Accompanied with all this is recognized, art historians and art critics