论文部分内容阅读
专利权是人类运用自然规律改造世界而依法产生的专有权利,权利本体的私权属性是其归类于私权的根本依据,公法不应过多地介入其空间。但是如果完全套用民事侵权理论,则会成为另一个理论认识上的误区。在公共政策这一价值目标的指引下,各国专利法上的专利侵权的概念已与民事侵权的基本内涵相背离。将专利侵权的客体范围限定在财产权范围之内并辅之以商业实施的外在限制条件,既可保障专利权人商业利益的实现,又可以避免社会公众因其享受社会文明成果而陷入动辄侵权的尴尬境地。
Patent right is the exclusive right that human beings uses law of nature to transform the world and is legally produced. The private right attribute of right ontology is its basic basis classified in private right, and public law should not intervene in too much space. However, if we completely apply the theory of tort, it will become another misunderstanding in theoretical understanding. Under the guidance of this value target of public policy, the concept of patent infringement in patent law of various countries has departed from the basic connotation of civil infringement. Limiting the scope of the object of patent infringement within the scope of property rights and the external restrictions imposed by commercial implementation can not only ensure the realization of the commercial interests of patentees but also prevent the public from being infringed upon frequently for enjoying the achievements of social civilization The awkward position.