论文部分内容阅读
人民法院案例指导制度(以下简称“案例指导制度”)实施以来,其合法性和实际效果一直饱受质疑。对于合法性问题,通过对我国现行法律的考察可以得出结论:案例指导制度符合我国现有法律规定的制度,并且契合社会主义法治理念。对于案例指导的实际效果,则主要取决该项制度的定位,尤其是如何妥善处理案例指导制度与司法解释制度的关系。案例指导制度与司法解释制度在制度背景、法律效力、适用方法和表现形式存在差异,但两种制度的差异性非但不构成两项制度的隔阂,反而因为两项制度强烈的目的共向性而能够使二者相生相依、相辅相成,进而实现“相互配合,互为补充”的制度设计。
Since the implementation of the case guidance system of the People’s Court (hereinafter referred to as the “case guiding system”), its legitimacy and actual effectiveness have been questioned. For the issue of legality, through the investigation of the current law in our country, we can conclude that the case guidance system conforms to the system stipulated by the existing laws in our country and meets the socialist concept of the rule of law. The actual effect of case guidance mainly depends on the positioning of the system, especially how to properly handle the relationship between case guidance system and judicial interpretation system. There are differences in the institutional background, legal validity, applicable methods and manifestations between the case guidance system and the judicial interpretation system. However, the differences between the two systems not only do not constitute the barrier between the two systems, but because of the co-existence of the two systems, Can make the two depend on each other, complement each other, and then achieve “complement each other, complement each other ” system design.