论文部分内容阅读
以违反公共政策为由拒绝承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的做法,为《承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》(以下简称《纽约公约》)所肯定,且有其正当性基础。现有案例表明,一国以违反该国公共政策为由拒绝承认与执行外国仲裁裁决时,无一例外地否定了裁决的整体效力,导致在公共政策和国际商事仲裁裁决的承认与执行之间产生了一定的矛盾与冲突。如果按照是否违反承认与执行地国的公共政策,将裁决分割执行,可在一定程度上缓和上述矛盾,并且符合《纽约公约》的规定,契合其目的。
The refusal to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards on the ground of violating public policies is affirmed and justified on the basis of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“the New York Convention”). The available cases show that the failure of a State to refuse to recognize and enforce a foreign arbitral award on grounds of its public policy negates the overall validity of the award and leads to the rejection of the arbitration award between public policy and the recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards Produced a certain degree of conflicts and conflicts. Segregation of judgments on the basis of whether they violate the public policies of the countries recognizing and enforcing them can ease the above contradictions to a certain extent and meet the purpose of the New York Convention.