论文部分内容阅读
围绕功能性特征的解释问题,司法和行政规则的直接分歧引发诸多关注。仅止于将两种规则予以字面一致的研究,忽视司法与行政体系实质差异及最终目标上的协调,对实践中的难点和亟需解决的问题并无裨益。而侵权判断中特征比对之复杂性、权利要求解释中的多种考量因素及思维过程之不确定性,对具体案件判断过程及结论的影响,远甚于前述两个不同规则表面上的矛盾。对于二元体系下法律适用割裂所造成的权利要求解释之冲突,应基于侵权判断的实践层面寻求恰当的解决之道。只有个案实践中予以精细化分析,才能在拒绝保护或予以无效这两种极端解决方案之间寻找合理化解释路径。
Around the issue of the interpretation of functional characteristics, the direct divisions between the judiciary and administrative rules have drawn much attention. The mere fact that the two rules should be studied in a literal manner and the neglect of the substantive differences and ultimate goals of the judicial and administrative systems is not conducive to practical difficulties and problems that need urgent solution. However, the complexity of feature comparison in the judgment of infringement, the multiple considerations in the interpretation of claim, and the uncertainty of the thinking process have an impact on the judgment process and conclusion of specific cases far more than the contradictions on the surface of the two different rules . Conflicts of interpretation of claims caused by the separation of applicable law under the binary system should be based on practical aspects of the judgment of infringement to find an appropriate solution. Only through detailed analysis of the case practice can we find a reasonable path of explanation between the two extreme solutions that denial of protection or invalidation.