论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠和开腹手术的临床疗效,研究更好的临床治疗方法。方法:选取我院2006年3月—2009年2月间收治的异位妊娠患者120例,将其随机分为腹腔镜手术治疗组和开腹手术治疗组各60例,在年龄、孕次、手术史等方面经统计学分析无显著性差异,具有可比性。结果:与对照组相比,观察组患者在出血量、患者下床时间、住院时间和焦虑评分方面均具有显著性差异(P<0.01),观察组发热率相比对照组具有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:本次研究证明,异位妊娠患者经腹腔镜手术治疗与传统开腹手术相比,具有出血少、术后恢复效果好、术后发热率低以及患者心理状况较好等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy and laparotomy to study better clinical treatment. Methods: 120 cases of ectopic pregnancy admitted to our hospital from March 2006 to February 2009 were selected and randomly divided into laparoscopic surgery group and laparotomy group, 60 cases each. Their age, gestational age, Surgical history and other aspects of statistical analysis showed no significant difference, comparable. Results: Compared with the control group, the observation group had significant differences in bleeding volume, out-of-bed time, hospitalization time and anxiety score (P <0.01), and the observation group had a significant difference in the rate of fever compared with the control group P <0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that laparoscopic surgery in patients with ectopic pregnancy compared with the traditional laparotomy, with less bleeding, good postoperative recovery, postoperative fever and the psychological status of patients with better, etc., is worth the clinical Promote the application.