论文部分内容阅读
我的论文是按照几个不同的步骤进行的。首先,我企图坚持我的主张,即在社会科学中我们中了自然科学榜样的邪魔。随后,我将概述关于这种邪魔的各种可观察的反应。我的立场将是阐明我的驱邪主张。这将有一系列论证来评述自然科学和社会科学之间通常的界限。于是,我提出应该把科学事业看作一个整体,并且在统一的科学事业中得出自然科学和社会科学的区别,与其说自然科学和社会科学之间的某种区别是一种经验研究的课题,不如说在两种科学即自然科学和社会科学之间存在着一种超经验的或形而上学的界限。从方法论的、形
My essay follows several different steps. First of all, I attempt to uphold my claim that we have demoted the example of the natural sciences in the social sciences. I will then outline the various observable reactions to this demon. My position will be to clarify my excuse. There will be a series of arguments to comment on the usual boundaries between the natural and social sciences. Therefore, I proposed that the scientific undertaking should be regarded as a whole, and the difference between the natural sciences and the social sciences should be drawn from a unified scientific undertaking. Instead of some difference between the natural sciences and the social sciences, it is an empirical research topic Rather than saying there is a transcendental or metaphysical boundary between the two sciences, the natural sciences and the social sciences. From the methodology, shape