我国于2012年修订了《民事诉讼法》纳入了实际联系原则以保护弱势当事人的利益,维护国家司法管辖权。但在国内与涉外协议管辖无差别的适用实际联系原则忽视了实际联系原则在不同情境下的价值差异,也导致了在适用上的种种困境,需要相关司法解释予以释清。 In 2012, China amended the Civil Procedure Law to include the principle of actual contact to protect the interests of disadvantaged parties and safeguard the national jurisdiction. However, the principle of practical relevance, which is not different from the jurisdiction of foreign-related agreements in China, neglects the value differences of actual contact principles in different situations and also leads to difficulties in the application. Relevant judicial interpretations are needed to be clarified.