论文部分内容阅读
宋代文人对于“杜甫与海棠”的关系表现出浓厚的阐释兴趣,并提出了不少推论和主张。限于材料,“杜甫究竟写没写海棠”已经不能定谳,但这一话题成为文人普遍关心的事实背后却彰显着阐释行为的历史性特征,具有一定的理论价值;此外,宋代题咏海棠之作的腾盛与宋人的补亡心态不无关联,与其说宋人是在补杜诗之亡,倒更像是一场与杜甫的文学竞技。他们形塑了杜甫诗学的典范地位,也尝试去超越典范。
The Song dynasty scholars showed a strong interest in explaining the relationship between “Du Fu and Begonia”, and put forward many inferences and propositions. Limited to the material, “Du Fu did not write Begonia ” can not be fixed, but this topic has become the general concern of the literati behind the fact that the interpretation of the historical features of interpretation of behavior, has a certain theoretical value; In addition, Begonia made by Teng Shing and the mentality of the make-up of the Song Dynasty is not unrelated, not so much the Song people are Du Fu poetry to death, more like a literary competition with Du Fu. They have shaped the exemplary status of Du Fu’s poetry and tried to go beyond the model.