在我国行政法治背景下,行政诉讼证据补充规则存在立法零乱和理论研究分散的问题,具有完善的必要性。补证规则应当对诉讼中的各类主体进行分类剖析,将公正、公开、公平的程序正义理念一以贯之,在“先取证、后裁决”的程序规则下细化各类诉讼主体的补证权,从而实现各方补证关系的和谐配置。 Under the background of administrative law in our country, there is the problem of legislative scrambling and divergence of theoretical research in the Supplementary Rules of Administrative Litigation Evidence, which has the necessity of perfection. The Supplementary Provisions should classify the various types of litigants in the litigation so as to consistently, consistently and impartially, impartially and equitably in the concept of procedural justice, and refine the testimony of various litigants under the procedural rules of “first forensics and subsequent adjudication” So as to realize the harmonious allocation of all parties’ certificates.