近期,南阳一位下班途中勇擒歹徒的交警,被有关部门认定为“见义勇为”并获奖金。此后不久,洛阳警方宣布,刑案受害人抓获犯罪嫌疑人的,可获奖励,甚至申报为“见义勇为”。发生在河南的这两起事件,都引起了巨大争议,它们不仅促使我们重新思考见义勇为奖励机制的范畴、功能等等,也提出了警察职责、公民义务如何定位等深层问题。本期“法界”专栏刊发的两篇调查分析报道,将与读者朋友共同研讨上述话题。 Recently, a Nanyang traffic police on his way out of work, was identified as “courageous ” and win the prize. Shortly thereafter, the Luoyang Police announced that criminals who seized criminal suspects may be rewarded and even reported as “courageous”. Both of these incidents in Henan have caused great controversy. They not only prompt us to rethink the scope and functions of the courageous reward system, but also raise the deep questions of police duties and civic obligations. This issue “Fa Jie ” column published two survey analysis reports, readers and friends will discuss the topic.