张作霖是中国历史上一个赫赫有名的传奇人物。有关他的传闻和资料可以说生动丰富,浩如烟海;但又褒贬不一,众说纷纭。要想将他写成电视剧本搬上屏幕,并非容易。七十年代末期有一本书把张作霖批得一无是处,甚至皇姑屯被炸也认为是“死有余辜”。另一本书则是三十年代日人所写,简直把张作霖奉若神明,称之为“中国一杰”,连他错杀爱将郭松龄也认为是“果断之举”。张作霖不平常的一生是非功过如何评说?我与合作者青年作家杨学志经过反复探讨,苦心研究,终于达到一个共识:要想写好张作霖这样一个有争议的人物,不能简单地把他放进一个固定的政治框架中“分类排队”应从当时的历史环境和特定的人物出发,深刻地揭示所处的时代焦点和他的惟权意识与民族文化心理尖锐复杂的矛盾冲突,真实地客观地再现出他那有棱有角、有血有肉,既金戈铁马又 Zhang Zuolin is an illustrious legend in Chinese history. The rumors and information about him can be said to be vivid and rich, vast and numerous, but mixed, divergent views. It’s not easy to put him on the screen for a TV script. There was a book in the late seventies that criticized Zhang Zuolin for not doing anything. Even the Huanggu Tun was bombed to think it was “dead beyond”. Another book was written by Japanese people in the 1930s. It was almost like Zhang Shenlin was enshrined in the gods and called it “China’s top genie.” Even Guo Songling, who mistakenly killed him, thought it was “a decisive move.” Zhang Zuolin unusual life is non-meritorious How to comment? My collaborator young writer Yang Xuezhi after repeated discussions, painstaking research, finally reached a consensus: To write Zhang Zuolin such a controversial figure, can not simply put him into a In the fixed political framework, “classified queuing” should proceed from the historical environment and specific characters at that time, revealing profoundly the contradictions and conflicts between the focus of the times and his psychic consciousness and the ethos and culture psychology, and truly and objectively reproducing His angular, flesh-and-blood, both gold and iron horses