论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨《精神病人刑事责任能力评定量表》在司法鉴定中的运用。方法收集刑事责任能力鉴定案例74例,由经过专门培训的人员按量表手册进行评分,并与专家鉴定结论进行比较。结果按照量表参考划界分分组,无、限定和完全刑事责任能力评分分别为(8.73±3.01)、(26.90±4.64)、(47.63±4.08)分,3组间及两两间存在显著性差异(F=252.754,P<0.01);量表评定与专家鉴定两种责任能力分级方法的一致性较好(Kappa=0.72,P<0.01);量表各条目评分与总量表分间的相关性均具有统计学意义(r=0.356～0.902,P<0.05)。结论《精神病人刑事责任能力评定量表》在徐州地区使用的信效度良好。
Objective To explore the application of “Scale of Criminal Responsibility Assessment of Mentally Ill” in forensic appraisal. Methods A total of 74 cases of criminal responsibility were collected and scored by the specially trained personnel according to the scale manual and compared with expert conclusion. Results According to the scale reference demarcation group, the scores of no, limited and complete criminal responsibility were (8.73 ± 3.01), (26.90 ± 4.64) and (47.63 ± 4.08), respectively, there were significant differences among the three groups and between the two groups (F = 252.754, P <0.01). The consistency of the two assessment methods was better (Kappa = 0.72, P <0.01) The correlations were statistically significant (r = 0.356 ~ 0.902, P <0.05). Conclusion The Scale of Criminal Responsibility Assessment of Mental Illness has good reliability and validity in Xuzhou area.