论文部分内容阅读
在当代道德哲学论域,人们通常认为,从亚里士多德到斯多亚派再到康德的这一脉络意味着道德哲学的一个形态转变,即从古典良品伦理学转变为现代义务伦理学。在这一解释模式中,正当、义务、责任等概念被赋予了某种现代色彩,良品概念被赋予了某种古典色彩。实际上,这一解释模式是值得商榷的。有充分的论据表明,所谓的现代正当观念其实早已为古典时代的希腊人拥有。在亚里士多德和康德以及斯多亚派之间虽然存在显见的不同,但他们其实可以会通一致,会通一致的基点在于他们都拥有一种“出于/为了自身”的道德意识结构。这种道德意识结构是人类从事道德哲学致思的普遍、共同的范式,可概述为“亚里士多德-康德范式”。
In the field of contemporary moral philosophy, it is generally accepted that the context from Aristotle to Stoics to Kant means a morphological shift in moral philosophy from the classical ethics of good to the modern ethics of obligation . In this model of interpretation, concepts such as legitimacy, obligation, responsibility, etc., have been given some modern color, and the concept of good works is given a certain classical color. In fact, this mode of interpretation is questionable. There is ample argument that the so-called modern concept of justification is in fact already owned by the Greeks in the classical era. Although there is a clear difference between Aristotle and Kant and the Stoics, they can all agree on the same point that they all have one “for / for oneself” Moral awareness structure. This kind of moral awareness structure is a universal and common paradigm for mankind to engage in moral philosophy, which can be summarized as “Aristotelian-Kant paradigm ”.