论文部分内容阅读
作为学习《谈话》心得的续篇、将循着老套路写作:摘录几句小平原话,然后再作点个人发挥。 繁华的市中心和偏僻地方的房子,交通方便地区和不方便地区的房子,城区和郊区的房子,租金应该有所不同。这段话,强调了房价要体现地区级差,怎样才能形成这种“体现地区级差”的房价?回答只能是:让市场供求去决定价格。反观推行时间不短、取得成绩不小的当今房改,我觉得,这方面偏离小平的指示最远。比如,在政策指向上应成为城市住房主体的经济适用房(撇开其可能发生的操作扭曲问题),其定价是以减免地价为基础的。如此处理,怎能“体现地区级差”?而时下盛行的那种用建造成本加上3％利润的定价公式,其跟“市场供求”又是何种关系?
As a sequel to learning the “talk,” I will follow the same old course of writing: extract a few words from Xiaoping Plain, and then make some personal play. The bustling downtown and houses in remote areas, convenient transportation areas and inconvenient areas of the house, urban and suburban houses, the rent should be different. This passage emphasizes that housing prices should reflect the regional differences. How can we form such a “reflection of regional differences”? The answer can only be to let the market supply and demand decide the price. On the contrary, the implementation of today’s housing reform, which is not short in time and achieves remarkable results, is, I think, the farthest from this directive. For example, in the policy direction should be affordable housing for the main urban housing (aside from the possible distortion of the operation), the pricing is based on the reduction of land prices. In this way, how can we “reflect the regional differences?” And what is the relationship between “the market supply and demand” and the prevailing prevailing pricing formula with construction costs plus 3% profits?