论文部分内容阅读
潘汝瑶、何国华两先生的《孙中山祖籍问题争论的始末》一文在本刊今年第2期登出后,引起了社会的反响。该文是赞成“紫金说”的,为一家之言。为了使读者能全面了解这一问题的讨论情况,本期特刊登中山大学孙中山研究所副所长邱捷教授撰写的《也谈关于孙中山祖籍问题的争论》一文。该文主张“东莞说”,亦为一家之言。这样,争论双方的观点都已摆明。今后这类来稿,如无新的突破(指有新观点、新资料),本刊不再登载。本刊发表的作者署名文章,均不代表本刊编辑部意见,其可取与否,由读者卓裁之。
Pan Ruyao, He Guohua two “Sun Yat-sen ancestral home debate over the issue of” article published in the second issue of this year, has aroused social repercussions. This article is in favor of “Zijin said,” as one of the words. In order to enable readers to fully understand the discussion of this issue, this issue is published in the article titled “The Argument about Native Issue of Sun Yat-sen” authored by Professor Qiu Jie, the deputy director of the Sun Yat-sen Institute at Sun Yat-sen University. The article claims that “Dongguan,” also for one of the words. In this way, the arguments of both sides have been clearly stated. In the future, if there is no new breakthrough in this type of manuscript (referring to new ideas and new materials), the publication will no longer be published. Articles published in the author’s signature article, do not represent the views of editorial department, its desirable or not, the reader referee.