论文部分内容阅读
非法证据的排除规则尽管以司法解释的形式被确立在中国刑事诉讼之中,但它在司法实践中却处于名存实亡的状态。在重新构建这一制度时,需要明确非法证据的范围、非法取证手段的类别以及排除非法证据的法律后果,同时还建立专门的程序性裁判机制,确立非法证据的排除申请、有关排除非法证据问题的司法听审形式、有关的举证责任和证明标准以及排除规则适用后的再救济问题。
Although the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence is established in the criminal procedure in China in the form of judicial interpretation, it is in name only in judicial practice. In reconstructing this system, it is necessary to define the scope of illegal evidence, the type of illegal evidence collection and the legal consequences of excluding illegal evidence. At the same time, a special procedural adjudication mechanism should be established to apply for the exclusion of illegal evidence and to exclude illegal evidence The form of judicial hearings, the relevant burden of proof and the standard of proof, and the question of redress after the exclusion of the rule applies.