论文部分内容阅读
用不同修补材料修补的各种基本层板的破坏荷载(根据无损层板的破坏荷载(见表2)标称的)对斜接修补示于图9～10,而对阶形搭接修补示于图11～12。在这些图中的结果是对干试件的和对浸水中14d增湿试件的。还得到曝露在100%湿空气180F下达到1.1%含水量试件的资料。由水和湿空气增湿试件的破坏荷载显示相同的趋势。因此,由湿空气增湿试件的数据这里未给出,但在文献[29]中有。根据数据指出下列趋势: 对湿法手糊修补(斜接和阶形搭接),修补材料的类型未显著影响破坏荷载。当试件中干的并在70F下试验时,用预浸料修补(斜接和阶形搭接)的破坏荷载值高于
Destructive loads for various base laminates repaired with different repair materials (nominally based on the destructive load of the non-destructive lamina (see Table 2)) are shown in Figures 9 to 10 for the miter repairs, In FIGS. 11-12. The results in these figures are for wetted specimens and for wetted specimens for 14 days in water. Information was also obtained on specimens that reached a moisture content of 1.1% at 180F with 100% wet air. The destructive load on specimens wetted by water and humid air showed the same tendency. Therefore, the data from wet-air humidification specimens are not given here but are found in [29]. The following trends are indicated by the data: For wet hand layup (miter and step overlap), the type of patching material does not significantly affect the breaking load. When specimens were dried and tested at 70F, the failure load values for repairs (miter and step laps) with prepreg were higher than