通过对世界银行和美国国会等组织鼓励甚至强迫发展中国家创造“法律”的种种企图的剖析 ,作者对它们的“法治”观提出了质疑。作者认为 ,它们所谓的“司法不受政治干扰”的法治目标实际上并不存在 ,拒绝法律的政治特性将导致两个严重后果 :其一是将低估法律发展的困难和复杂性 ;其二是将导致法律是好的而政治是坏的优劣分野。此外 ,作者还比较了美国和日本的法治经验及其对发展中国家的影响。 By analyzing the various attempts by organizations such as the World Bank and the U.S. Congress to encourage or even force developing countries to create “law,” the authors have challenged their view of “the rule of law.” The author believes that their so-called goal of “rule of law without political interference” actually does not exist. Refusing the political nature of law leads to two serious consequences: one is that it will underestimate the difficulty and complexity of legal development and the other is that The law will be good and politics is bad. In addition, the author compares the rule of law experience of the United States and Japan with their impact on developing countries.