不能把公有制与私有制对立起来。我们现在还处于社会主义初级阶段,不能要求一切事物都绝对地纯。公有制也是如此,应该允许它包含一些私有制成份。比如,在一些股份制企业里,国家股和集体股占主要地位,虽然有一些自然人或职工持股,企业的性质还是公有的。那种同广大劳动者的个人利益和责任缺少联系的公有制,那种说起来“全民所有”,实际上谁也不负责的公有制,效率和效益都是不好的。只有建立起与劳动者的责权利相联系的,能够调动劳动者生产积极性,能 Public ownership can not be opposed to private ownership. We are still in the primary stage of socialism and can not demand that everything be absolutely pure. The same is true of public ownership, which should allow it to include some elements of private ownership. For example, in some joint-stock enterprises, state shares and collective shares dominate. Although some natural persons or employees hold shares, the nature of the enterprise is still public. The public-owned system that lacks contact with the personal interests and responsibilities of the vast majority of workers, the public-owned system that is “owned by the whole nation” and who is not responsible in fact, is not good at efficiency and effectiveness. Only by establishing a link with the workers’ rights and responsibilities and being able to mobilize the enthusiasm of workers