在我国的形式诉讼法中,对重复追诉的理解是在客观事实的基础上来展开的,如果客观事实上该事件具有疑点,那么检控方就可依据客观事实,提出证据,针对同一事件对被告人进行多次的重新审判和追诉,这样的法律概念显然与国际上对重复追诉的理解有着一定的出入,而这样的法律规定也使得被告人很容易受到同一事件的干扰,而不断的面临困境。因此,我国应该针对形式诉讼中的重复追诉进行法律上的限制,坚持以一事不再理原则为立法原则,从而保障被告人所应具有的权益。就形式诉讼中的重复追诉问题进行了简要的探究,仅供参考。 In our country’s formal procedural law, the understanding of repeated prosecutions is based on objective facts. If the facts are in fact doubtful points, then the prosecutor can provide evidence based on objective facts and provide evidence against the defendants It is obvious that such concept of law has some discrepancies with the international understanding of repetitive prosecutions. Such legal provisions also make the defendants vulnerable to the same incident and constantly face the dilemma. Therefore, our country should carry out legal restrictions on repeated prosecutions in formal litigation and adhere to the principle of non bis in idem as the legislative principle, so as to protect the rights and interests of defendants. A brief discussion on the issue of repeated prosecutions in formal litigation is for reference only.