论文部分内容阅读
上世纪六十年代,美国著名艺术哲学家、批评家阿瑟·丹托的《艺术的终结》一书面世,尔后,德国著名艺术史家汉斯·贝尔廷亦在上世纪八十年代中叶道出艺术史终结和艺术历史叙事的终结等著名论断。在业内,这均是学界显学,无论艺术终结论还是艺术史终结论,远非单指艺术本体的决绝消亡,它是西方学人对自身文化根脉有效的梳理和反思的必然结果。换言之,终结的恰恰是西方艺术的传统脉络固化的对艺术历史的定义,终结的只是以黑格尔美学为主导的对
In the 1960s, the book “The End of Art” by the famous American philosopher and critic Arthur Danto came out. Later, the famous German art historian Hans Belting also appeared in the mid-1980s The famous conclusion of the end of art history and the conclusion of artistic history narration. In the industry, this is a significant academic study, both the end of art and the conclusion of art history. It is far from a single conclusion that the ontology of art must die out. This is the inevitable result of Western scholars’ effective reflection and reflection on their own cultural roots. In other words, the end is precisely the traditional contextualized definition of art history in Western art, ending only with Hegelian aesthetics