由于在治学方法和叙述模式方面我们至今没有自己的系统东西,所以中国哲学史的研究者历来重视的,只是史料的编辑整理和鉴别考证。显然,这样的研究模式是有重大缺陷的,因为该模式本身并不具有真正深层的学术研究性质。这一模式的不足从胡适之后一直延续至今,且日趋极端。我们如果想真正推进中国现代哲学的进步,就必须回到对哲学问题本身的讨论,随时注意理性思辨的方法论在严格意义上使用。我们要警惕自己的思想跟着圣人走,跟着经典走,跟着学术权威走。哲学问题的解决与否,只能跟着思想的论证走。 Due to the fact that we have no systematic and systematic stuff in the methods of study and narration, the historians of Chinese philosophy have always attached importance to the editing and identification of historical materials. Obviously, such a research model is a major flaw, because the model itself does not have a truly deep academic nature. The inadequacies of this model have continued from the moment after Hu Shih and are becoming more and more extreme. If we really want to push forward the progress of modern Chinese philosophy, we must return to the discussion of the philosophical issue itself and keep an eye on the methodology of rational speculation in the strict sense. We should be wary of their own thoughts go along with the saints, follow the classic go, follow the academic authority to go. Whether to solve the philosophical problems or not can only be followed by the demonstration of ideology.