在鲁迅研究中,近几年有种说法,似乎鲁迅终其一生批的不是“真孔”而是“假孔”;甚至有的学者对五四新文化运动提出“打倒孔家店”所蕴含的彻底地不妥协地反封建的伟大历史意义也开始怀疑。鲁迅终其一生是批孔的,即使所批的是历代权势者捧起来的孔子,也与“真孔”在本质上具有一致性,这已被史实所证明。我感兴趣的倒是应该从历史哲学的角度,探讨鲁迅终其一生批孔与中国现代化历程的深刻联系。 In the study of Lu Xun, in recent years there is a saying that it seems Lu Xun’s life criticism is not “true hole” but “fake hole”. Some scholars even put forward the idea of ​​“Down with Confucius Store” in the May Fourth New Culture Movement The complete historical significance of anti-feudal conscientious and uncompromising beginnings also began to be questioned. Lu Xun’s life was approved by Confucius. Even if Confucius, which was approved by successive powerful people, was in essence consistent with “Zhen Kong,” it was proved by historical facts. What I am interested in is that we should explore the profound relationship between Lu Xun’s lifetime criticism of Confucius and the course of China’s modernization from the perspective of historical philosophy.