论文部分内容阅读
2003年,是中国科学院院士和中国工程院院士的选举年。关于两院院士选举的争论不断。各地方、各单位争比院士数目,院士制度政治化,学术腐败等或新或旧的问题纷纷暴露在人们面前,给院士选举这一科学界盛事蒙上了一层阴影。争议何来?为什么会发生那些查而有据的选举腐败?当许多人揪住一些表层的问题争论不休的时候,更需要深入到问题的本质,从院士制度的层面来探讨它的合理性以及一些急需改革的地方,以求能为中国的学术制度改革尽一点微薄之力。
In 2003, it was the year of election for academicians of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Chinese Academy of Engineering. Arguments on the election of academicians and scholars of the two academies continued. The number of contested and academicians in various places and units, the politicization of academician systems, academic corruption, and new or old issues have been exposed to the people, casting a shadow over the scientific community's event of academician election. Why do controversies arise? Where are the corrupt and well-founded elections? When many people hold onto the issues of the surface layer of argument, they need to dig deeper into the essence of the problem, discuss its rationality from the aspect of the academician system, and Some areas in urgent need of reform seek to make some modest contributions to the reform of China's academic system.