论文部分内容阅读
寻找善的定义是一个恒古话题。本文分别考察了中国儒家的“义利之辩”和中国基督教的“因信称义”中对善的定义方式。本文的考察展示了如下重要事实:首先,从逻辑上看,它们是两种对立的善定义方式。前者强调人在诚中完全占有善恶判断权,而后者则要求人在信中完全放弃判断权。其次,从生存上看,前者因拥有善恶判断权而必然走向霸权话语和思想僵化, 而后者则因放弃判断权而可能走向迷信。再次,当这两种善定义方式合二为一时,我们就进入一种悖论式的生存状态。
Finding the good definition is a constant topic. This essay examines the ways of defining good in Chinese Confucianism, “justification and justification” and “justification by faith” in Chinese Christianity respectively. The review of this article shows the following important facts: First, they are, logically, two good and opposite definitions of opposites. The former emphasizes that man completely holds the right of good and evil judgment in honesty, while the latter requires that people completely give up their judgment in the letter. Second, from the point of view of survival, the former must inevitably move toward hegemony and rigid thinking because of its right to judgment. However, the latter may be superstitious because of giving up his judgment. Third, when the two good ways of defining are combined, we enter a paradoxical state of existence.