论文部分内容阅读
目前国内社会科学界对证伪主义的理解存在两点问题:第一,未能在分析哲学的知识体系中全面把握证伪方法的意义和局限;第二,对假设检验方法与证伪主义之间的关系理解有误。实际上,在波普尔提出证伪主义之后,西方科学哲学界和知识社会学界都进一步批判和发展了这个科学方法论概念。对此予以必要的回顾和分析,有助于我们更恰当的使用证伪方法,克服当代社会科学研究中常见的形式主义问题。
At present, there are two problems in the understanding of falsificationism in the social science circles in our country: firstly, it fails to fully grasp the meaning and limitations of the falsification method in the analytical system of knowledge of philosophy; secondly, the hypothesis test method and falsificationism The relationship between understanding is wrong. In fact, after Popper put forward falsificationism, both the western philosophy of science and the sociology of knowledge have further criticized and developed this concept of scientific methodology. A necessary review and analysis of this will help us to use falsification more appropriately and overcome the problems of formalism that are common in contemporary social science research.