论文部分内容阅读
运用CNKI科技期刊学术不端文献检测系统和万方论文相似性检测系统对《第三军医大学学报》和《遵义医学院学报》605篇来稿进行同步检测,比较两种学术不端检测系统检测结果的差异性及以文献量复制比≥10%、≥20%和≥30%三个等级比较两种检测系统检测结果的检出率及一致性。结果显示AMLC与PSDS的检测结果存在差异(Z=-8.15,P<0.05);文献量复制比≥30%AMLC和PSDS检出率没有差别(P>0.05);文献量复制比≥20%、≥10%AMLC和PSDS检出率有差别(P均<0.05);三个等级的检测结果具有一致性(P均<0.001)。这一研究结果为编辑选择合适的检测系统提供了实证依据。
Using CNKI journals academic misconduct literature detection system and Wanfang thesis similarity detection system to synchronize the 605 papers published by the journal of Third Military Medical University and Journal of Zunyi Medical College, the results of two kinds of academic misconduct detection system were compared The detection rate and consistency of the two detection systems were compared in terms of the difference of the literatures’ copy ratio ≥10%, ≥20% and ≥30%. The results showed that the detection results of AMLC and PSDS were different (Z = -8.15, P <0.05); there was no difference between the detection rate of AMLC and PSDS (P> 0.05) The detection rates of ≥10% AMLC and PSDS were different (all P <0.05). The consistency of the three levels was consistent (P <0.001). The findings provide an empirical basis for editors to choose the right test system.