过去我们田径考试是繁琐哲学、形式主义,如期终考试,就内容来说有达标(远度、高度、速度等)、技术和理论等三方面。就考试方法来说又把达标、技术和理论分开考,二节课考成绩达标,二节课考技术,二节课考理论,加起来就是6节课,时间化得很多,理论又脱离实际。以铅球为例,考成绩达标就是考投远,谁投得远,谁的分数就最高。这样就有些学生不管姿势如何,凭着自己的力量拼命的投远,“白猫黑猫咬到老鼠是真猫”,老师也只能凭谁投得远记上“真猫”,也不管动作是否破坏,技术是否符合要求,因为你考的是投远,就只能按达什么样的远度,打什么样的分。考了投远,还要考技术和理论,理论也是考二个课时,学生考得晕头转向,还是理论不能指导实践。如过去跳高考试,有这样的情况, In the past, our track and field exams were trifling philosophies and formalisms, such as final exams, and standards (far, high, speed, etc.) on content, and technical and theoretical aspects. On the test method and again to the standard, technology and theory test separately, the two exams test results, two exams exams, two exams theory, add up to six classes, a lot of time, theory and from actual. Shot put, for example, the test results are standard test cast far, who voted far, who scores the highest. So that some students no matter how posture, with their own power desperately far away, “White Cat black cat bites the mouse is a real cat,” the teacher can only rely on who voted on the “real cat”, regardless of the action Whether to destroy, the technology meets the requirements, because you test is to cast Yuan, only by what kind of distance, what kind of points. Test the vote away, but also test technology and theory, theory is also test two classes, students confused confused test, or theory can not guide practice. Such as the past high jump exam, there is such a situation,