论文部分内容阅读
公共服务的供给中,政府的服务主体角色是不可替代的。尽管政府有很多亟待改革之处,但是也不能以市场化作为公共服务改革的唯一途径。政府直接供给在效率和适应性方面较差,但在有效性、公平性和广泛性方面则占有优势,而市场的高效率则相伴着高风险。公共服务市场发育不健全时,失败的风险都集中于政府身上,而失败成本则由政府埋单。现阶段来看,供给主体的一支独大给公共服务的良性发展带来了不利影
The supply of public services, the government’s main role is irreplaceable service. Although the government has many areas in urgent need of reform, it can not take marketization as the sole means of public service reform. Direct government supply is poorer in terms of efficiency and adaptability, but it is superior in terms of effectiveness, fairness and universality, while high efficiency in the market is accompanied by high risks. When the public service market is underdeveloped, the risks of failure are concentrated on the government, while the failure costs are paid by the government. At this stage, the benign development of public service rendered by a dominant supplier has brought a negative impact