近年来,所传卢斯说的“装饰就是罪恶”大受批判,被当作现代建筑“反人性”的一个证据。如此轻而易举地把它批倒,反而叫人奇怪:为什么这个“不值识者一哂耳”的命题,竟然会被历史传下来了呢?就象要了解“住宅是居住的机器”必须了解《走向新建筑》整本书和那个时代一样,要了解“装饰就是罪恶”,至少也得了解被认为提出了这个命题的文章的全篇和那个时代。只有了解 In recent years, Luz said that “decoration is sin” is greatly criticized and used as evidence of “anti-humanity” in modern architecture. It is so confusing to do so easily, but it is rather bizarre: Why is the proposition that “the person who is not worth knowing is coming out of the ears” will be passed down by history? Just as it is necessary to understand that “the house is a living machine”, one must understand “ Going to the New Architecture The whole book is the same as that time. To understand that ”decoration is sin", you must at least understand the whole article and the era of articles that are considered to have proposed this proposition. Only understand