论文部分内容阅读
在基础设施特许经营领域立法缺失和滞后的情况下,为了给需要进行的BT(built-transfer)特许经营融资项目寻找一个有效的法律依据,有的地方政府参照政府采购法适用政府采购程序来选择BT投资人,进而得出采用政府采购程序无须要求政府方面提供回购担保的结论。然而,BT项目是否完全适用政府采购法?将BT项目纳入政府采购范围是否即意味着投资者的投资得到了有效保障?笔者从如下方面对政府采购和BT项目进行比较,以求教于同仁。
In the absence of legislation and lag in the field of infrastructure concession, in order to find an effective legal basis for BT (built-transfer) franchise financing project which needs to be carried out, some local governments choose the government procurement procedure according to the government procurement law BT investors, and then come to the conclusion of the government procurement process without requiring the government to provide repo guarantees. However, the BT project is fully applicable to the government procurement law? The BT project into the scope of government procurement means that investors have been effectively protected investment? The author from the following aspects of government procurement and BT projects to seek advice in my colleagues.