一、有的咨询企业凭借本系统上级主管部门赋予的特权,将国家投资的大中型项目的论证、评估、可行性研究等全部独揽下来,形成独霸市场,别的咨询企业无法问鼎。这其实是一种滥用行政权力的垄断行为,与我国《反不正当竞争法》第七条:“政府及其所属部门不得滥用行政权力,限定他人购买其指定的经营者的商品,限制其他经营者正当的经营活动”的精神相违背。因为咨询研究成果亦是一种信息商品,某些咨询企业凭借本系统上级主管部门赋予的特权垄断某些咨询项目的行为有悖公平竞争的原则。此外,一些官办的信息机构垄断信息资源也是影响我国信息服务业公平竞争的重要因素。目前,政府信息机构拥有信息资源总量的80%,大部分列入保密范围内部使用。的确,这当中有些信息关系到国家的安全和利益确需保密或内部使用,然而对大众化的信息或知识是不应该允许某些人或机构以垄断方式独家占有和经营的。这些信息包括国家法律、政策及各种 First, some consulting enterprises rely on the privileges granted by the superior departments of the system to monopolize the demonstration, assessment and feasibility studies of large and medium-sized projects invested by the state and form the sole control over the market. Other consulting enterprises can not make their aspirations. This is actually a monopoly of abuse of administrative power. In line with Article 7 of China’s “Anti-Unfair Competition Law,” “the government and its subordinate departments must not abuse their administrative powers to restrict others from buying the commodities of their designated managers and restrict others Operators legitimate business activities, ”the spirit of the contrary. Because consulting research is also an information product, certain consulting firms monopolize certain consulting projects with the privilege granted by the superior departments of the system in violation of the principle of fair competition. In addition, some government-run information agencies monopolize information resources is also an important factor affecting the fair competition in China’s information service industry. At present, government information agencies have 80% of the total amount of information resources, most of which are used within the scope of confidentiality. Indeed, some of these messages do affect the security and interests of nations that need to be kept confidential or used internally. However, popular information or knowledge should not allow some people or institutions to monopolize and operate exclusively. This information includes national laws, policies and various kinds