论文部分内容阅读
刘涌,中国13亿人口中的一分子,中国当代最著名的黑社会头子。刘涌触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》,理当受到国家法律的制裁,这是三岁小孩都能明白的道理。但现在,犯了“死罪”的刘涌,由一审判为“死刑,立即执行”,被二审以完全相同的罪行终审改判为“死刑,缓期两年执行”。这就是说,在法律的光天化日之下,在13亿中国人众目睽睽之下,犯下《刑法》中“领导黑社会罪、故意伤害罪、非法经营罪、故意毁坏财务罪、行贿罪、妨碍公务罪、非法持有枪支罪”等七项滔天大罪的罪犯——刘涌,被坦坦荡荡地“放生”了。判处刘涌“生”的原因和“死”的结果是怎么样的? 让我们看看辽宁省高级人民法院二审、终审刘涌《判决书》的判词:刘涌“论罪应当判处死刑,但鉴于其犯罪的事实、性质、情节和对于社会的危害程度以及本案的具体情况,对其可不立即执行。”这就是说:刘涌由“死刑,立即执行”,改为“死刑,缓期两年执行”,就是因为以上这51个字的
Liu Yong, one of China’s 1.3 billion people and the most famous triad leader in contemporary China. Liu Yong has violated the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China and deserves to be sanctioned by the national laws. This is the truth that three-year-olds can understand. However, Liu Yong, who committed the “death penalty”, is now convicted of “execution of death penalty and execution immediately” in the first instance, and is adjudicated as “death penalty and two-year suspension” on the same trial as the second instance. This means that under the broad daylight of the law, under the eyes of 1.3 billion Chinese people, they have committed crimes of “leading gang crime, intentional assault, illegal business operation, purposely destroying financial crimes, bribing criminals and impeding public services” under the Criminal Law. , “Illegal possession of firearms” and seven criminals - Liu Yong, was “liberated” by Tan Tan. Let us look at the judgment of the Higher People’s Court of Liaoning Province in the second instance and the final judgment of Liu Yong’s verdict: Liu Yong “Arguing the crime should be sentenced to death, but in view of the facts of its crimes The nature, the plot, the degree of harm to the society and the specific circumstances of the case may not be enforced immediately. ”That is to say, Liu Yong is replaced by the phrase“ execution of death penalty and execution for two years ”because" This 51 words