论文部分内容阅读
胡风事件的举足轻重作用的三次论争,同时也构成了文学在40年代发生意识形态转折的三个关健环节,因此,胡风事件的历史根源也可以表述为胡风与文学意识形态转折的碰撞。文学的意识形态转折以40年代初期的“民族形式问题”论争为发端,在与胡风论争的左翼主流派一方,民族形式的讨论实际上就是以《讲话》为集中体现的毛泽东文艺理论体系这一“集体智慧的结晶”酝酿成熟的过程,这就自然决定了胡风与左翼同仁的思想分歧具有意识形态的严重性质;40年代中期的“主观”论争以胡风和“才子集团”共同发起重庆反教条主义运动为起点,他们的本意是响应延安整风,但由于学术与政治意识形态逻辑的错位,实际上变成了对《讲话》的不自觉冲撞,因而他们反而成为由胡乔木主持的、名至而实不宣的重庆整风的对象;1947、1948年的香港批判是将1945、1946年对胡风的缺席批判公开化,同时也是以《讲话》文艺模式全面改造和规范文艺运动的意识形态询唤的发出和示范,而胡风则以《论现实主义的路》这一答辩表明,意识形态对其的询唤最终落空。
Therefore, the historical origin of Hu Feng incident can also be described as the collision of Hu Feng and the turning of literary ideology. The three major links between Hu Feng incident and the pivotal role of Hu Feng incident also constitute the three key links in the ideological turning point of literature in the 1940s . The turning point of the ideology of literature starts with the debates on the issue of “national forms” in the early 1940s. On the one hand, the left-wing mainstream faction struggles with Hu Feng. The discussions on the ethnic forms are actually the theoretical system of Mao Zedong’s literature and art which is embodied in “speech” A “crystallization of collective wisdom” brewing mature process, which naturally determines the serious ideological nature of the ideological differences between Hu Feng and left-wing colleagues; the “subjective” debate in the mid-40s was initiated by Hu Feng and the “gifted group” Their anti-dogmatism movement started from Chongqing. Their intention was to respond to Yan’an rectification. However, due to the mismatch between the logic of academic and political ideology, it actually became an unconscious collision of the “speech,” and instead they were chaired by Hu Qiaomu , The unforgettable object of Chongqing’s rectification; the Hong Kong Criticisms of 1947 and 1948 criticized the absence of Hu Feng in 1945 and 1946, at the same time, it also comprehensively transformed and standardized the literary and art movement with the speech and literature model Ideology called for the issue and demonstration, and Hu Feng Zeyi “on the road to realism,” the defense that the ideological inquiry It ended in vain.