论文部分内容阅读
本刊曾一再承诺，选稿不体现编者好恶，但不知各位看官留意与否，《文学自由谈》从未追随时髦，刊发过对郭老不恭的文字。露出此一言行相悖的“破绽”，仅仅出于一分应有的良知：绝不迁就肆意贬损郭老学问的十足无知之徒的浅薄，更不放任妄加评判郭老人格的并非良善之辈的卑下。本文作者研究郭沫若多年，求索梳理，心得颇丰。我们愿意舍得页码，推荐这篇很有立场，同时又很有力量的文章。天地悠悠，智者不朽。郭老绝非那种人性脱尽的所谓钢梁、铁塔。郭老只是一株真实的大树，随时序更迭，虽有花谢叶落，但终究树高根深，枝繁叶茂，展现的必是百年千年福荫中华文化的无尽风情。
The magazine has promised again and again that the manuscript does not reflect the likes and dislikes of the editors. However, I do not know whether the judges pay attention to it or not. “Literature Liberty Talks” has never followed the trendy trend and published the objectionable letter to Guo. Exposing this “flaw” that runs counter to what is said and done is only due to a proper conscience: it must not take away the superficiality of the totally ignorant who wantonly derogate from Guo Lao’s study, nor even allow them to judge Guo Laogeng improperly Humble. The author of this article studies Guo Moruo for many years, and searches for the card, quite good at it. We are willing to deserve the page number, recommend this very position, but also very powerful articles. Long world, wise immortal. Guo Lao never the kind of human nature of the so-called steel beam, tower. Guo old is only a real big tree, with the change of timing, although the flower Xie Ye fall, but after all, the tree is deep and rich, showing the must-century Millennium Fu Chinese culture endless style.