论文部分内容阅读
1988年“上海之春”组委会委托某公司联系赞助单位。某公司以制作商品广告在“上海之春”活动期间公开展出为条件,向有关单位收取赞助费。经联系商定,某公司与电器厂签订了合同,规定:由公司为电器厂产品制作水上舞台产品商标广告、电子显示广告、横幅广告,在“上海之春”活动期间公开展出,价金为五千元。后电器厂未按合同规定付款并要求解除合同。但此时广告已在报上登载及在音乐会场陈列,因此公司不允解除合同,并按约继续完成了广告制作和展出的全部工作。电器厂仍不付款而涉讼。
1988 “Shanghai Spring” Organizing Committee commissioned a company contact sponsor. A company to produce goods advertising in the “Spring of Shanghai” during the public exhibition as a condition, to the relevant units for sponsorship fees. Upon negotiation, a company signed a contract with the Electric Appliance Factory, which stipulates that the company shall make a watermark product trademark advertisement, an electronic display advertisement and a banner advertisement for the electric appliance product factory during the “Shanghai Spring” event at a price of Five thousand yuan. After the electrical plant fails to pay the contract and request the lifting of the contract. However, at this time, the advertisements were posted on the newspapers and displayed in the concert venue. Therefore, the Company did not allow the contract to be canceled and all the work of making and displaying advertisements was completed on schedule. Electrical plant is still not paid and litigation.