论文部分内容阅读
立足于对马克思主义经典著作文本的考证,运用唯物史观和辩证唯物主义的分析方法评判罗伯特·海尔布隆纳的利弊得失,并力图在评介中厘清对马克思主义的科学认识。主要结论是:首先,罗伯特·海尔布隆纳在《马克思主义支持与反对》一书中为我们展现了解读马克思主义的新视角——既支持又反对。其次,海尔布隆纳以4大要素界定马克思主义的研究范畴,容易造成对马克思主义理论体系的割裂与分化,破坏了马克思主义的系统性和科学性。再次,海尔布隆纳提出的唯物史观和辩证法在后现代语境下面临的两大挑战,为我们进一步研究马克思主义的“唯物史观”和“历史决定论”提供了新的思路。认为海尔布隆纳将政治行为缺陷归咎于马克思对人的本质规定的阐述,是对马克思主义的曲解;指出在没有经过系统的文本考察,就断言马克思没有预见和解释政治权力扩大的影响也是武断的。
Based on the textual research of Marxist classic texts, the paper analyzes the pros and cons of Robert Heilbronn by means of historical materialism and dialectical materialism and seeks to clarify the scientific understanding of Marxism in the review. The main conclusion is: First of all, Robert Heilbronn shows us a new perspective on Marxism in Marxist Support and Opposition - both support and opposition. Secondly, Heilbronn defined the research scope of Marxism with four major factors, which could easily lead to the fragmentation and differentiation of Marxist theoretical system and the systematic and scientific destruction of Marxism. Thirdly, the two major challenges posed by Heilbroner in the postmodern context of the historical materialism and dialectics provide us with a new basis for our further study of Marxist “historical materialism” and “historical determinism.” Train of thought. He argues that Heilbronn’s blaming the deficiencies of political behavior on Marx’s interpretation of the essence of man is a misinterpretation of Marxism. He pointed out that without a systematic examination of the text, Marx asserted that the unpredictability and the influence of the expansion of political power were arbitrary of.