《文史知识》1994年第4期载有《传胪的出典》一文。该文作者能将“现存极少”的材料转录出来,以飨读者,这种做法是值得称赞的。读后,为了寻找佐证,我就查阅了一些资料。但所得有的与《万国公报》所载根本不同,有的虽能略见端倪,但仍难以服人。因之,我就产生了以下怀疑:科举制度时鸣赞官是否有由二甲一名担任的事实?二甲一名的传胪之称是否确实由此而来?《万国公报》所记到底非真还是孤 “Cultural and historical knowledge” in 1994 the fourth contains a “biography of the classic” a text. It is praiseworthy for the author to transcribe the “extant” excercises to readers. After reading, in order to find evidence, I checked some information. However, some of the gains made are radically different from those contained in the “Universal Declaration of Gazette.” Although they may be somewhat clumsy, they are still hard to come by. Therefore, I have the following suspicion: Is there any truth in the tribute system when the Mingzan officer was held by a second-born member? Not true or not