论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨护理干预对不积定型心绞痛患者的效果及价值。方法以我院于2015年6月至2016年6月间收治的62例不积定型心绞痛患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组各31例。对对照组患者采用常规护理,对观察组患者采用综合护理,对比两种护理方法的临床效果。结果观察组的护理总有效率及护理后的SDS、SAS评分均优于对照组,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对不积定型心绞痛患者实施综合护理,效果显著,值得推广和应用。
Objective To investigate the effect and value of nursing intervention on patients with non-angina pectoris. Methods Totally 62 patients with nonsustained angina pectoris admitted in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were randomly divided into control group and observation group of 31 cases. The control group of patients with conventional care, the observation group patients with comprehensive care, compared with the clinical effects of two nursing methods. Results The total effective rate of nursing care and SDS and SAS scores in the observation group were better than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions The implementation of comprehensive nursing for patients with non-angina pectoris has a significant effect and is worthy of promotion and application.